Most of us have wondered at some point about the origin of the phrase  “The Lost Cause”, or even why it is the title of this journal. According  to the American Heritage Dictionary, the use of “Lost Cause” to refer  to the Confederacy’s bid for independence began in the 1860’s; indeed,  by the time Sam Watkins published “Company Aytch” twenty years later he  used the term with such familiarity and pride that it had obviously been  an established part of the Southern lexicon for quite some time. The  subtle but crucial transformation in usage happened almost immediately  after the War—the struggle for Southern Independence was no longer “a  lost cause” in the colloquial, but instead became “The Lost  Cause” in reverential reflection on the idealism of defense of home and  constitution from invasion—both physical invasion and invasion of  philosophies repugnant to the agrarian, traditionalistic South and to  the original intent of the Constitution. To stand against these  invasions was seen as a victory unto itself; using “The Lost Cause” a  backhanded way to recognize the military reality of defeat while saying  that The Lost Cause was also The Right Cause to a Southern nation which  placed honor above life itself—a conceptuality which is foreign to the  modern mind saturated with Jerry Springer and Howard Stern.
    Our Southern ancestors were also much better trained in literary  allusion and historical reference than we are today. When Moses Ezekial  created the Confederate monument at Arlington cemetery, he inscripted  upon it the Latin phrase: “Victrix Causa Diis Placuit Sed Victa Caton”  which translates to “The Victorious Cause was Pleasing to the gods, But  the Lost Cause to Cato.” This is a quote from Lucan’s epic Pharsalia (Civil  War) written about Julius Ceasar’s Roman civil war with Senator Pompey.  The phrase doesn’t mean much, though, without knowing who Cato was. In  his 1999 address given at the Arlington monument, Rev. Fr. Alister C.  Anderson, Chaplain (Colonel) U.S. Army (Ret.) and Chaplain-in-Chief of  the Sons of Confederate Veterans explained:
    You may remember that Julius Caesar made himself dictator of the Roman  Empire for life and he marched against Pompey and the republican forces  who resisted Caesar’s military and political grab for absolute control  and power. Pompey was an admirer of Cato the Younger, who lived one  hundred years earlier and was devoted to the principles and virtues of  the early Roman Republic. Cato had one of the greatest reputations for  honesty and incorruptibility of any man in ancient times, and his  Stoicism put him above the graft, bribery and mad despotic ambition so  prevalent in Roman politics of his day. Pompey’s army, however, was  defeated by Caesar's legions at the Battle of Pharsalia in the Balkans,  and Caesar went on to become what can be called the first of the Roman  Emperors.
    The Latin quote illustrates the truth of an historical and political  continuum from the time of this ancient war to that of the War for  Southern Independence. “Victrix Causa,” “the victorious cause”,  referring to Julius Caesar’s inordinate ambition and his lust for total  power and control, is compared with President Lincoln and the federal  government’s desire for power to crush and destroy the South. Next we  read “diis placuit” which translates “pleased the gods”. In this  context, gods are with a small “g” and refer to the gods of mythology;  the gods of money, power, war and domination, greed, hate, lust and  ambition. Next we come to the noble climax of this quotation, “sed victa  catoni” which translates “but the lost cause pleased Cato.” Here Lucan,  the poet, refers to Pompey’s fight to retain the old conservative,  traditional republican government of Rome. Even though Pompey was  defeated by Caesar’s greater military power, his defeat, nevertheless,  pleased the noble Cato. And here, of course, Cato represents the noble  aims of the Southern Confederacy. The South fought politically to  maintain the Constitution which had guided her safely for eighty-seven  years. She merely wanted to be left alone and be governed by it.
    In this context the use of “The Lost Cause” by Southerners becomes much  more clear. The allusions to the virtuous cause of Pompey in fighting  to save traditional values against overpowering tyranny would have  instant appeal to Southerners, and taking into account Lucan’s Pharsalia  would have been familiar reading to educated Southerners like Ezekial,  this two thousand-year-old quote has to be considered the leading  candidate as origin for usage of “The Lost Cause” term by Confederates.
    The phrase has not, though, had universal acceptance among Southerners,  with some feeling it to carry a negative or defeatist connotation; the  most notable critic of the phrase was the renowned S. A. Cunningham,  publisher of the original Confederate Veteran  magazine. His criticism has been taken to heart by some in support of  their disdain for usage of the phrase. In the December, 1902 issue of Confederate Veteran  Cunningham called the term “detestable” in complaining that  correspondents were using it in submitted articles. Cunningham said it  “assuredly originated in the minds of prejudiced Northerners”. However,  few people who quote Cunningham are aware that the original Confederate Veteran magazine and the original Lost Cause  magazine were competing publications, and occasionally sparred with  each other in print (as Stewart Cruickshank’s accompanying article will  show). Taken in that light, it is possible  that  Cunningham’s criticisms may have had less than completely altruistic  motivations (after all, Cunningham was a shrewd and experienced  businessman), and such context should be taken into some consideration  by those who base their dislike for the phrase solely on Cunningham.  Ironically, a biography of Cunningham was published in 1994 and when it  was reviewed by Book News Inc. the reviewer’s first sentence called  Cunningham “a central figure in the Lost Cause  movement in the post-Civil War South” and that quote now accompanies  virtually every site listing the biography for sale. That a reviewer  would use a term to describe a man who found it so detestable he refused  to print it in his own magazine is a posthumous insult no one should  have to suffer, especially a man who did so much for Confederate  heritage as S. A. Cunningham.
    When the Kentucky Division of the SCV was re-formed in 1983, choosing  the name of a turn-of-the-century Confederate publication originating in  the Bluegrass State as the title for the division newsletter seemed  only natural to the division leadership (just as the national SCV had  taken up the title for its magazine from Cunningham’s). While  publication of The Lost Cause has  been somewhat erratic in the twenty-two years since, the current  magazine format is a serious effort by the Kentucky division to carry  out the mission of the original publication: “to be a(n) illustrated  journal of history”, both of our Kentucky Confederate ancestors, and our  SCV today.  
3 comments:
The quote unquote virtuous cause of owning other human beings.
Your an idiot IF you assume no northerner ever owned another human being. Even "honest" abe had slaves until he decided it would look bad too free the slaves while owning some, so he sold them to the south. Honorable, huh?
Did Lincoln own the slaves, or did his wife? If they belonged to his wife, why would you expect that Lincoln would even be able to sell them? Perhaps selling them after her father died was entirely Mary Todd's decision, and she resisted any suggestions that they be freed.
Post a Comment